spammers should die take 423
I know I’ve ranted it before, but its really one of those that just deserves a “you need to learn to read an RFC moron” response (apart from the obvious spammers should die and go to hell anyway).
For the record and my sanity, I stick to RFC complaint mail readers for 3 reasons.
1. I don’t have to remember which box has my “mailboxes”
2. I don’t have to deal with microsloth viruses that auto-propogate
3. I DON’T HAVE TO DEAL WITH IDIOT NON-NETIQUETTE AWARE MORONS
–
From fmooungkwr@snail-mail.net Sun Jan 16 00:04:31 2005
Received: from 200165220162.user.veloxzone.com.br ([200.165.220.162])
by xxx.xxx.xxx with smtp (Exim 4.41)
id 1Cq5Oc-0004Fh-7P
for xxx@xxx.xxx; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 00:04:31 -0800
Received: from CKQZD-JJ94 (200.165.220.162) by 200.165.220.162; Sun, 16 Jan 2005
+02:08:04 -0600
From: Alexis Elliott
To: xxx@xxx.xxx
Subject:
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 02:08:04 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=”Java.QFNLG.04300420003169830″
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Message-Id: <841628454@WFTRLF>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1437
Get a capable html e-mailer
